Site Counter

Monday, September 18, 2006

Review of The First Way of War: American War Making on the Frontier, 1607-1814.

The following review has been submitted to On Point: The Journal of Army History and should appear in an upcoming issue. My review of Bruce Chadwick's The First American Army appeared in the Fall 2006 issue of On Point. That review can be found here.

The First Way of War: American War Making on the Frontier, 1607-1814. By John Grenier. Cambridge University Press, 2005. i-xiv, 232 Pp. Figures. Maps. Index. ISBN 0-521-84566-1. $30.00

Through gripping accounts taken from primary sources to maps of the regions in question, Air Force officer and Air Force Academy history Professor John Grenier argues and illustrates how America developed its unique military heritage and style of war making based upon irregular warfare. Specifically, Grenier examines the killing of non-combatants and destruction of crops and homes during the wars in the colonies as well as the American Revolution, the Indian wars of the early republic, and the War of 1812.

In his introduction, Grenier discusses the history and historiography of military and specifically American military history, including the development of America'’s unique way of making war. He lists off several historians and works from the past that discuss this topic, which provide the reader with a good background on the subject presented in this work.

Grenier presents the history of American rangers through much of the work and he keeps the story in chronological order beginning with the wars in the colonies from 1607-1689, which occurred between colonists and Indian tribes. He brings to light how ranger companies were generational with sons often leading units that their fathers once led. He then moves into the wars on the continent between France and England in the eighteenth century as well as the lesser-known wars, noting the role that rangers and the tactics they used played in the conflicts in the mid-eighteenth century prior to the French and Indian War (1754-1763).

Grenier then breaks the flow of the work with a chapter dealing with the history of petite guerre in Europe. This story is important for understanding this work, but would better serve the work if it was the first chapter as in the current placement as the third chapter, it breaks the flow in a way that hurts the story that the author is presenting. This is not to say that the chapter does not belong as it does, but rather that it belongs in a different place within the larger work.

Grenier then examines America'’s way of war making in the French and Indian War. He notes that Britain realizes the need for American rangers, especially after Braddock'’s defeat, but that they are slow to realize this. Shortly after Braddock'’s defeat, various units of American rangers are formed in response, including one unit formed by Robert Rogers (the famous Roger'’s Rangers). He also notes how the British after initially relying on the rangers attempt to replace them, but fail. Finally, he concludes the chapter by examining how the British adapt the American way of war.

Grenier also examines the Revolutionary War period, primarily focusing on the war on the frontier, which includes stories about George Rogers Clark as well as the Northeast frontier. Grenier then examines the 1790s, which present great defeats and triumphs on the frontier from St. Clair'’s defeat to the Battle of Fallen Timbers. The story then carries into the early 1800s, focusing on events like the Indian war in the Northwest against Tecumseh and the Creek War to the south, finally ending in 1815.

Overall, Grenier'’s scholarship is quite good with many primary sources drawn together for this work, including the papers of Sir William Johnson, as well as many government documents. He also provides a good selection of maps and illustrations to aid the reader in understanding. His style is formal, but not beyond the general reading audience, which gives it a wider audience as both historians and general readers can understand the book. Though he is an Air Force officer, Grenier proves that he knows the subject well. His work adds greatly to the scholarship of both American history and US Army history. Both historians interested in the topic and general audiences will benefit from reading The First Way of War.

Daniel Sauerwein
AHF member
Grand Forks, ND

Thursday, September 14, 2006

Regarding comments

The following was sent to me concerning the article by William F. Sauerwein WHAT MILITARY OPTION FOR IRAN?:

"I just don't understand war mongers like you! What makes you think American actions are currently making this world more secure? It is instead creating more tension and conflicts. If America can develop their own Nuclear weapons, why can't other people develop theirs? What right does America have in denying other people the nuclear option?"

Let me state that I moderate comments for this site to prevent spammers from making useless comments. I initially deleted this comment because 1. The author chose to remain anonymous and 2. It presented a tone of anger, not reason. Upon rethinking the comment, I decided to post it here so you could have the chance to read it and possibly comment on it. While I welcome comments, please (if possible) post your name. Do not hide yourself behind anonymity as it hurts your argument. Also, please try to offer good reasons with supporting evidence if you disagree with a post, don't just resort to cheap shots and name calling. I will admit bias towards William as he is my father, but I also happen to know that he is very knowledgeable in many areas and to call him a war monger is uncalled for and rude since he has 24 years of honorable service to this nation in the US Army under his belt.

To sum this up, if you comment, BE RESPECTFUL of the authors and offer reasoned arguments with good evidence. If you resort to name calling, I will not publish your comment. If you present just angry ranting, I most likely will not publish your comment. Again, we welcome debate and discussion and comments, but please be respectful of us as authors and keep your comments civil.

Daniel Sauerwein,
Creator