Site Counter

Sunday, January 29, 2006

Review of The First American Army: The Untold Story of George Washington and the Men Behind America’s First Fight for Freedom. By Bruce Chadwick

This is a copy of my review, which will soon appear in On Point, the quarterly journal of the Army Historical Foundation. I hope you enjoy it.



The First American Army: The Untold Story of George Washington and the Men Behind America’s First Fight for Freedom. By Bruce Chadwick. Naperville, IL: Sourcebooks, Inc., 2005. ISBN: 1-4022-0506-6. Illustrations. Bibliography. Notes. Index. Pp. 399. $24.95.

Bruce Chadwick, former journalist now lecturer in History at Rutgers and writing teacher at New Jersey City University, attempts to tell the story of the ordinary soldier in the Continental Army. Utilizing the diaries of seven central figures, including one doctor, a poet, and one chaplain, Chadwick intertwines these soldiers’ stories with small quotations from numerous other sources to bring to life a story that should have been told years ago.
The reader experiences Bunker Hill, Saratoga, Trenton, and Yorktown, as well as the disastrous Quebec campaign through the eyes of men who fought there. Readers are witness to the ravages of smallpox in the camps and posts following the Quebec campaign, and the harrowing winter at Valley Forge. The struggle to maintain the fight through mutinies and desertions is a constant in the book, which enhances the image of the Continental Army and further reveals just how desperate the war was and how stubborn the Americans could be in their fight for the cause. The reader also learns the little known story of an all-black regiment and the story of the participation of blacks in the conflict in which they face opposition based on race and the fear of a slave revolt, but gain the opportunity to serve because of manpower shortages.
Chadwick shows the personal sides of the soldiers, both good and bad. The reader observes one soldier who goes to great lengths to obtain leaves to see his beloved wife, while another leads a secret life of adultery. We see chaplains pushed to their breaking points attempting to minister to the sick and dying, only to come back and deliver powerful sermons that lift the spirits of the army. The reader experiences the dedication of the men as doctors continue to work until near death, while other common soldiers will reenlist even after facing repeated serious illness.
In many ways, Chadwick’s work is long overdue, but it has weaknesses. One of the major areas is scholarship. Numerous worthwhile sources, especially primary documentation, are used, but Chadwick does not give adequate endnote citations, which leaves the reader no real clear structure to check the work’s accuracy. In fact, Chadwick begins his bibliography with the following:
All of the quotes from . . . the central figures in the book, were from their diaries. To cite each of the hundreds of quotes from the same sources would be futile, so the single sources for each man’s quotes are listed below. The citations from the more than one hundred other people in the work are listed separately.(371)
The main issue with this quotation is that there are very few endnotes given the amount of material quoted and covered, which prevents the reader from knowing exactly in which source and where the author used material. Instances of reading over two full pages before encountering the next citation in sequence were common. While the validity of the sources is not in question, the lack of endnotes prevents the reader from fully appreciating the work and may raise questions about this works validity.
The other problem area in this work deals with the chapter devoted to women of the revolution. Instead of mentioning the story of Molly Pitcher or the few women who dared to impersonate men to serve in the Army, Chadwick uses this chapter to talk about prostitution and the sexual escapades of the men involved with them. This may turn off many readers who were expecting to learn about women serving in the Army or aiding in other ways.
Overall, Chadwick presents a compelling story, which will excite readers. His background in journalism is present as the story is well written. However, the endnote issue detracts from the work’s value to historians attempting to do research into this time. If these issues are corrected in a second edition, Chadwick’s story will be more worthwhile and useful for a wider audience.

Daniel Sauerwein
Jerseyville, IL
AHF member

Friday, January 13, 2006

Welcome to the Newest Member of the Team

I would like to welcome William Sauerwein, the newest member of the Military History Blog. As the name implies, we are related as he is my father. William brings 24 years of experience in the Army to this blog. Be on the lookout for his posts and enjoy.

Thursday, January 12, 2006

St. Clair’s Defeat vs. the Battle of Fallen Timbers: Defeat and the Lessons Learned and Applied in the Old Northwest Indian War, 1791-1794

I hope that you enjoy this post. It is a paper that I wrote for a History class. I apologize for the small size.
Please make any suggestions after reading.

In 1791, the United States was handed its worst military defeat ever at the hands of the Indians. Three years later, the Indians would learn the hard way about revenge. These two events, Gen. Arthur St. Clair’s defeat in 1791 and Gen. Anthony Wayne’s resounding victory at the Battle of Fallen Timbers in 1794, raise many questions. What made these two battles have such different outcomes? What evidence can be found from accounts of travelers years later? What can be learned from these events today? Both St. Clair’s defeat and the Battle of Fallen Timbers illustrate much about the early republic, both her weakness as well as her resolve. Much can be gained from exploring these two events and the impact they had.

The frontier of the new United States was a wild and dangerous place in the late 18th century. New settlers to the Northwest Territory faced the prospect of Indian raids and the still present British forces stirring up the Indians and threatening war.[1] It was in this area that Arthur St. Clair led his army to defeat while serving as the territorial governor.[2] Estwick Evans, a traveler in the region in 1818, noted the site where the battle took place. He stated, “On the river Calumet, which enters the Wabash, stands fort Recovery, and just above this fort is the place of St. Clair’s defeat.”[3] This account illustrates that this battle was so significant that it was noted by people years later.

What happened at the site described by Evans was an event of unspeakable slaughter and horror. On November 4, 1791, Maj. Gen. St. Clair, having hoped “to establish a fort at the head of the Maumee River” became engaged near the Miami village named Kekionga against the Miami chief Little Turtle.[4] Little Turtle, whose tribal name was Michikinikwa was one of the most respected and powerful chiefs in the region[5], which made him a formidable opponent for St. Clair’s force of around 1,400.[6] The power of the Miami was illustrated in the account of Capt. Thomas Morris. Morris described the Miami as “the very people who have lately defeated the Americans in three different battles”.[7] Shortly before daybreak, an Indian force of 1,040 warriors, composed of Shawnee, Miami, Delaware, as well as Ottawa, Chippewa, and various other tribes, encircled the American camp.[8] The battle began when the Indians attacked the camp of a group of Kentucky militia approximately 270 strong, with a force of around 300. The Kentuckians fled in all directions and their pursuers eventually caught many of them.[9] One of the militia, a man named Bradshaw, later recalled that upon being able to shake his pursuer, tripped him, and “drove [his] hunting knife through his throat, severing his jugular [vein]”.[10] With the militia in a panic, St. Clair’s army was now in a weakened state as the Indians attacked.

The main body of the American force, which consisted of much of the U.S. army as well as many camp followers, took positions in their rectangular encampment area of about 400 by 75 yards, which is why the militia was encamped in a separate area.[11] With the militia in a retreat, St. Clair’s force now faced the full brunt of Little Turtle’s force. Thomas Irwin, a survivor of the battle later wrote that St. Clair and his other officers believed that the Indians “would not attack an army where there was so many [cannon] with them”.[12] As the morning continued, St. Clair would begin to find out just how wrong his assumption was. Unfortunately, for St. Clair, his artillery was ineffective and made no dent in the Indian onslaught.[13] The battle that ensued around St. Clair was one of the three that Capt. Morris referred to in his journal.[14]

The battle began to wear away at St. Clair as he realized that the Indians were destroying his army. He ordered Col. William Oldham to lead a counter-attack similar to that of the Indians. Oldham reportedly told his commanding officer, “No, damn it, that’s suicide. I won’t do it”.[15] St. Clair, shocked at this act of insubordination, responded to Oldham saying, “You’ll do it, Colonel, or by Christ I will run you through”.[16] Right after this exchange, a ball tore off the back of Oldham’s skull and he fell forward dead in front of a stone-faced St. Clair.[17] St. Clair attempted to rally his men, raising his sword and leading Oldham’s men in a bayonet charge against the enemy’s left flank. He repulsed the Indians briefly, however his men dropped so quickly that after three attempts too few men were available to mount a fourth charge.[18] The traveler Francois André Michaux later mentioned another officer who fell in the battle, Maj. Gen. Hart. He stated that, “This officer, of the most distinguished merit, fell in the famous battle that General St. Clair lost in 1791, near Lake [Erie], against the united savages”.[19] The Indians would soon wreak a great amount of destruction on St. Clair’s army as the battle continued to rage.

The Indians enjoyed a system of organization that would be advantageous to them as they fell upon the Americans. The Indians had put aside all of their differences and formed a tribal alliance, in which all tribes were enthusiastic in their roles in defeating the whites.[20] One of the successes in this alliance was the presence of an overall leader in Little Turtle.[21] According to an account from the battle, the Indians “concentrated their shots on the active officers whom they could easily distinguish”.[22] The account continued, mentioning that “General St. Clair had six bullet holes in his clothing but was not wounded.”, however “General Butler was killed”.[23] The Indians were able to use advantages that favored them and would ultimately win the day.

The result of Little Turtle’s attack was frightful. According to the above account, “The battle raged for three hours with the carnage among the Americans about twenty times that among the Indians”.[24] The cost to the Americans
. . . totaled 914, including 630 dead and 184 wounded. In addition, almost half of the estimated 200 camp followers, made up of wives, children, and prostitutes, were killed. Fewer than 500 of the 1,400 soldiers escaped with a whole skin.[25]
Clearly, Little Turtle had handed the Americans not only a horrible strategic defeat, but a psychological one as well. Of the American dead, 37 were officers[26], compared to an estimated 151 Indians killed.[27] This incredible victory would be short lived, as the Indians would eventually face a revitalized American army under a new, tougher commander, “Mad” Anthony Wayne.

After the disastrous defeat of St. Clair’s army, the United States faced the threat of Indians with a much smaller army since many had been killed or wounded in the battle. One of the consequences for the young republic that resulted from this defeat was the first Congressional investigation under the federal Constitution.[28] St. Clair wished to resign his commission and retire while keeping his generalship. However, President Washington decided not to allow this.[29] The investigating committee did not directly criticize St. Clair; however, they found one key area that may have contributed to the defeat. The committee noted,
. . . that the 2,300 men gathered at Fort Washington were reduced to 1,700 “fit for duty” by the time the army began the last leg of its journey on October 24; and that their numbers were further reduced to 1,400 on October 31 when “about sixty of the Kentucky militia deserted in a body and the first regiment [of regulars] was detached with a view to cover a convoy of provision . . .[30]
In the end, St. Clair resigned his commission on April 7, 1792 and Anthony Wayne, a veteran of the Revolutionary War, took command.[31] The stage was set for Wayne to enact revenge on the Indians.

Wayne, an experienced Indian fighter, drove the ideas of “tactics, training, and discipline” into his new “Legion of the United States”.[32] By the autumn of 1793, Wayne was ready and pushed northward. However, because of a lack of supplies, Wayne was forced to halt his push and his army encamped at Greenville, where he continued to train his men. By the summer of 1794, Wayne’s army was ready to move.[33] Wayne was ready for a fight, and having made no contact with the enemy on the eve of the battle, he set his men to the task of constructing a camp, which they named Camp Deposit.[34] Little Turtle was confident that he could defeat Wayne and make him “walk in a bloody path”.[35] Little Turtle had every reason to be confident, having defeated St. Clair’s poorly trained army three years earlier; however, Wayne was not St. Clair and Little Turtle would learn that the hard way.

The “confederated” Indian tribes moved into position on August 18, having fasted in order to make stomach wounds less severe. However, they did not meet the enemy, soon grew weak from hunger and thirst, and dwindled in numbers until only around 500 remained to meet 1,000 Americans.[36] According to the journal of William Clark, of future Lewis & Clark fame, the battle on August 20 began with, “a [shower] of Rain [which] prevented our move at the [hour] appointed”.[37] Clark further noted that by seven that morning the army had formed “Line of March” and was experiencing difficulties as they faced thick woods on their left and “a number of [steep ravines]” on the right.[38] Clark added that after two hours that the advance guard of the army spotted the enemy and took fire.[39] The battle that would go down in history as the Battle of Fallen Timbers had begun.

After the initial encounter with the Indians, the advance guard retreated to the main body of the army.[40] The right flank of the army, led by Gen. Wilkinson, upon taking enemy fire, immediately “formed [and] returned fire”.[41] A combined infantry and mounted charge, in which Capt. Campbell, the leader of the mounted troops was killed, forced the Indians to quit the field.[42] The Indians attempted to attack the left flank, but were repulsed. A cavalry charge drove the enemy back about three-quarters of a mile, and the army replenished itself with whiskey, pushed the enemy from the field, and then advanced to within one mile of a British garrison.[43] Having accomplished this, the army then made camp near the British garrison.[44]

Wayne’s resounding victory did not come without a price. What Gen. Wilkinson described as “a mere skirmish” cost the Legion 133 men, of these 33 were dead including two officers.[45] According to the journal of Clark, the two officers were Capt. Campbell and Lt. Towles, and the number of American dead was 240, compared to 30 to 40 enemy dead out of a force of 900 Indians and 150 Canadians.[46] Clark’s figures may be in dispute, due to different figures appearing in other sources. However, Clark was at the battle, but the problems with Clark’s figures are that they appear to make the victory hollow due to difference in number of lives lost on both sides. One thing that remains constant is that Wayne had achieved an incredible victory over the Indians.

In the aftermath of the victory, the Indians were in a panic. The British commander noted with disgust that the Indians “behaved excessive ill . . . and afterwards fled in every direction”. He further added that “their panic was so great that the appearance of fifty Americans would have totally routed them”[47] Another British officer, Lt. Col. England, noted, “that the confederated tribes no longer could be relied on for the primary defense of the Detroit region”.[48] These observations illustrate the magnitude of Wayne’s victory.

Travelers to the region years later noted both battles and even met with people who served at Fallen Timbers and fortunately, their experiences remain. George W. Ogden passed through the areas of Greenville and Fort Recovery, and noted, “just above this fort is the memorable place of St. Clair’s defeat”.[49] Francois André Michaux noted that the army marched against the Indians in defense of settlers and that the repulsion of the Indians, culminated in Wayne’s victory at Fallen Timbers.[50] Estwick Evans mentioned a meeting with a Col. P. who was “an officer under General Wayne, during his famous expedition against the [Indians]”.[51] Tilly Buttrick traveled in the lower Sandusky, which was known to be “an important Wyandot village” prior to Fallen Timbers.[52] Buttrick pressed on to Greenville, where Wayne built a fort and established his headquarters after the battle.[53] Edward Flagg mentioned having met with a pioneer who had hunted “where Boone, and Whitley, and Kenton once roved”.[54] The man named Kenton that Flagg refers to is Simon Kenton who served with the army during Wayne’s campaign.[55] These travelers knew of the events surrounding the places they visited and met with many people along the way who had taken part in them, thus making the stories of their travels more interesting and valuable to historians today.

While St. Clair forced a congressional investigation, Wayne forced a peace. Having defeated the Indians and establishing his base at Greenville, in 1795, Wayne prepared to make peace with the Indians. Major Thomas Hunt, commander of Fort Defiance, reported to Wayne the conditions of the Indians. He stated that, “The poor devils were almost starving to death before they got here”.[56] Timothy Pickering, the negotiator, wanted the treaty to hand over more territory to the United States.[57] Wayne was allocated $25,000 in various goods, which included hats, blankets, knives, axes, wine, and liquor.[58] On July 15, 1795, Wayne began the council, stating, “Younger brothers, . . . I take you all by the hand” and “Rest assured of a sincere welcome . . . from your friend and brother Anthony Wayne”.[59] Using the Treaty of Paris (1783) and the Fort Harmar Treaty, Wayne justified the Americans right to the Indian lands.[60] While Little Turtle argued that the Americans were taking the best Indian lands,[61] many chiefs accepted the treaty and the council closed on August 10 with Little Turtle swearing allegiance to the United States on August 12.[62] With the signing of the Treaty of Greenville, the war between the United States and the Northwest Indians was over.

St. Clair’s defeat and the Battle of Fallen Timbers illustrate both the weakness of and strength of the new republic. St. Clair’s bungled campaign led to the worst military defeat at the hands of the Indians for the army. Even though he should have been able to use his superior numbers to crush the Indians, his cockiness and coldness would be his downfall. On the other hand, Little Turtle, fresh from this victory would view the American army with contempt and thus would meet his own defeat at the hands of a much more experienced Indian fighter and general, Anthony Wayne. These two events shaped the history of the new nation, with St. Clair’s defeat bringing about the first congressional investigation in the history of the constitutional system. Wayne’s victory would eventually allow for the creation of a new state, Ohio and ensured that the United States controlled the northwest. Travelers observed these events in their accounts years later, illustrating the impact that these battles had on history. The lessons of long ago can be applied today. In the same way as St. Clair’s defeat was a huge psychological as well as strategic defeat for the new nation, the events of September 11 can be viewed as our St. Clair’s defeat, due to its impact on our nation, both psychologically and strategically. On the other hand, the victories that the United States has achieved in Afghanistan and other places as well as the victories that will eventually come in the War on Terror can be comparable to the Battle of Fallen Timbers. Someday maybe our society will experience its own Treaty of Greenville.


Notes


[1] James Ripley Jacobs, The Beginning of the U.S. Army: 1783-1812 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1947), 164.
[2] “St. Clair, Arthur”, Dictionary of American Biography, 16 (New York: C. Scribner's sons, 1935), 294.
[3] Estwick Evans in Reuben Gold Thwaites (ed.), Early Western Travels, VIII (Cleveland, OH: Arthur H. Clark, 1904), 265.
[4] Richard Battin, “Early America’s Bloodiest Battle” in The Early America Review, [online journal] (Summer 1996 [cited 25 April 2004]); available from World Wide Web @ http://earlyamerica.com/review/summer/battle.html.
[5] “Little Turtle”, Dictionary of American Biography, 13-14 (New York: C. Scribner's sons, 1935), 300.
[6] Wiley Sword, President Washington’s Indian War: The Struggle for the Old Northwest 1790-1795 (Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 1985), 167.
[7] Capt. Thomas Morris in Reuben Gold Thwaites (ed.), Early Western Travels, I (Cleveland, OH: Arthur H. Clark, 1904), 327.
[8] Sword, 176.
[9] Sword, 178.
[10] Sword, 178.
[11] Sword, 173.
[12] Frazer E. Wilson, “St. Clair’s Defeat: As Told by an Eye-witness from Original Mss.” in The Scholarly Journal of the Ohio Historical Society, [online journal] (378, Vol. 10, Num. 3, Jan. 1902 [cited 25 April 2004]); available from World Wide Web @ http://publications.ohiohistory.org/ohstemplate.cfm?action=detail&Page=0010378.html&StartPage=378&EndPage=380&volume=10¬es=&newtitle=Volume%2010%20Page%20378.
[13] Allan W. Eckert, That Dark and Bloody River: Chronicles of the Ohio River Valley (New York: Bantam Books, 1995), 566.
[14] Morris in Early Western Travels, I, 327.
[15] Eckert, 567.
[16] Eckert, 567.
[17] Eckert, 567.
[18] Eckert, 567.
[19] Francois André Michaux in Reuben Gold Thwaites (ed.), Early Western Travels, III (Cleveland, OH: Arthur H. Clark, 1904), 178.
[20] Leroy V. Eid, “American Indian Military Leadership: St. Clair’s 1791 Defeat” in The Journal of Military History, (Vol. 57, Num. 1, Jan. 1993), 82.
[21] Eid, 78.
[22] Wilbur Edel, Kekionga!: The Worst Defeat in the History of the U.S. Army (Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers, 1997), 88.
[23] Edel, 88.
[24] Edel, 89.
[25] Edel, 89.
[26] William Henry Smith (arr.), The St. Clair Papers: The Life and Public Services of Arthur St. Clair Soldier of the Revolutionary War, President of the Continental Congress, and Governor of the North-Western Territory (New York: Da Capo Press, 1971), 176.
[27] Frazer Ells Wilson, “St. Clair’s Defeat” in The Scholarly Journal of the Ohio Historical Society, [online journal] (42, Vol. 11/Num. 1/July 1902 [cited 25 April 2004]); available from World Wide Web @ http://publications.ohiohistory.org/ohstemplate.cfm?action=detail&Page=0010378.html&StartPage=30&EndPage=43&volume=11¬es=&newtitle=Volume%2011%20Page%2030.
[28] Edel, 95.
[29] Edel, 93-94.
[30] Edel, 96.
[31] Edel, 101.
[32] American Antiquarian Society, A Precise Journal of General Wayne’s Last Campaign (Worcester, MS: The Davis Press, Inc., 1955), 6.
[33] American Antiquarian Society, 6.
[34] American Antiquarian Society, 19-20.
[35] R. Douglas Hurt, The Ohio Frontier: Crucible of the Old Northwest, 1720-1830 (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1996), 133.
[36] Hurt, 134.
[37] R. C. McGrane, “William Clark’s Journal of General Wayne’s Campaign” in The Mississippi Valley Historical Review, (Vol. 1, Num. 3, Dec. 1914), 428.
[38] McGrane, 428.
[39] McGrane, 428.
[40] McGrane, 428.
[41] McGrane, 428.
[42] McGrane, 428.
[43] McGrane, 428-429.
[44] McGrane, 429.
[45] Sword, 306.
[46] McGrane, 430.
[47] Sword, 312.
[48] Sword, 312.
[49] George W. Ogden in Reuben Gold Thwaites (ed.), Early Western Travels, XIX (Cleveland, OH: Arthur H. Clark, 1905), 36.
[50] Michaux in Early Western Travels, III, 157.
[51] Evans in Early Western Travels, VIII, 120.
[52] Tilly Buttrick Jr. in Reuben Gold Thwaites (ed.), Early Western Travels, VIII (Cleveland, OH: Arthur H. Clark, 1904), 78.
[53] Buttrick Jr. in Early Western Travels, VIII, 84.
[54] Edward Flagg in Reuben Gold Thwaites (ed.), Early Western Travels, XXVI (Cleveland, OH: Arthur H. Clark, 1906), 215.
[55] Flagg in Early Western Travels, XXVI, 215.
[56] Sword, 324.
[57] Sword, 325.
[58] Sword, 325.
[59] Sword, 327.
[60] Sword, 328.
[61] Sword, 329.
[62] Sword, 330.


Works Cited

American Antiquarian Society. A Precise Journal of General Wayne’s Last Campaign. Worcester, MS: The Davis Press, Inc., 1955. 6, 19-20.

Battin, Richard. “Early America’s Bloodiest Battle.” The Early America Review. (Summer 1996). 25 April 2004 .

Buttrick Jr., Tilly. Early Western Travels. Ed. Reuben Gold Thwaites. VIII. Cleveland, OH: Arthur H. Clark, 1904. 78, 84.

Eckert, Allan W. That Dark and Bloody River: Chronicles of the Ohio River Valley. New York: Bantam Books, 1995. 566, 567.

Edel, Wilbur. Kekionga!: The Worst Defeat in the History of the U.S. Army. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers, 1997. 88, 89, 93-94, 95, 96, 101.

Eid, Leroy V. “American Indian Military Leadership: St. Clair’s 1791 Defeat.” The Journal of Military History. Vol. 57, Num. 1, (Jan. 1993): 82.

Evans, Estwick. Early Western Travels. Ed. Reuben Gold Thwaites. VIII. Cleveland, OH: Arthur H. Clark, 1904. 120, 265.

Flagg, Edward. Early Western Travels. Ed. Reuben Gold Thwaites. XXVI. Cleveland, OH: Arthur H. Clark, 1906. 215.

Hurt, R. Douglas. The Ohio Frontier: Crucible of the Old Northwest, 1720-1830. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1996. 133, 134.

Jacobs, James Ripley. The Beginning of the U.S. Army: 1783-1812. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1947. 164.
“Little Turtle.” Dictionary of American Biography. 13-14. New York: C. Scribner's sons, 1935. 300.

McGrane, R. C. “William Clark’s Journal of General Wayne’s Campaign.” The Mississippi Valley Historical Review. Vol. 1, Num. 3, (Dec. 1914): 428, 429, 430.

Michaux, Francois André. Early Western Travels. Ed. Reuben Gold Thwaites. III. Cleveland, OH: Arthur H. Clark, 1904. 157, 178.

Morris, Capt. Thomas. Early Western Travels. Ed. Reuben Gold Thwaites. I. Cleveland, OH: Arthur H. Clark, 1904. 327.

Ogden, George W. Early Western Travels. Ed. Reuben Gold Thwaites. XIX. Cleveland, OH: Arthur H. Clark, 1905. 36.

Smith, William Henry (arr.). The St. Clair Papers: The Life and Public Services of Arthur St. Clair Soldier of the Revolutionary War, President of the Continental Congress, and Governor of the North-Western Territory. New York: Da Capo Press, 1971. 176.

“St. Clair, Arthur.” Dictionary of American Biography. 16. New York: C. Scribner's sons, 1935. 294.

Sword, Wiley. President Washington’s Indian War: The Struggle for the Old Northwest 1790-1795. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 1985. 167, 173, 176, 178, 306, 312, 324, 325, 327, 328, 329, 330.

Wilson, Frazer E. “St. Clair’s Defeat: As Told by an Eye-witness from Original Mss.” The Scholarly Journal of the Ohio Historical Society Vol. 10, Num. 3, (Jan. 1902). 25 April 2004 <
http://publications.ohiohistory.org/ohstemplate.cfm?action=detail&Page=0010378.html&StartPage=378&EndPage=380&volume=10¬es=&newtitle=Volume%2010%20Page%20378>, 378.

Wilson, Frazer Ells. “St. Clair’s Defeat.” The Scholarly Journal of the Ohio Historical Society Vol. 11, Num. 1, (July 1902). 25 April 2004 <
http://publications.ohiohistory.org/ohstemplate.cfm?action=detail&Page=0010378.html&StartPage=30&EndPage=43&volume=11¬es=&newtitle=Volume%2011%20Page%2030>, 42.

Sunday, January 01, 2006

Happy New Year!

May your 2006 be a happy one. Continue studying and researching military history and uncover new things. Happy New Year to all.